Changes to legislation are matter of dialectics
Belarus could shift to one-round parliamentary elections
By Vasily Kharitonov
Changes to electoral legislation are only implemented out of necessity (not from outside pressure), as President Alexander Lukashenko recently noted at a meeting focusing on how best to improve electoral legislation. The Head of State stressed that all issues are open to discussion but that the Electoral Code has been in place in Belarus since 2000, bringing forth four parliamentary election campaigns and one national referendum, in addition to three presidential elections and various local council elections.
“Despite reproach from our opponents, our elections have been held in line with the Electoral Code, honestly and openly, securing the expression of the Belarusian nation’s will. Our legal mechanism of organising elections works smoothly and effectively,” he emphasised.
The President believes that, like any procedure, the mechanism must adjust to changing times, working flexibly. “However, improvement should not entail the destruction of established and steadily operating institutions,” he asserted.
The President remarked that the matter had been discussed with the presiding judge of the Constitutional Court. “No legislation can be passed once and for all since life is ever changing. Legislation must keep up with the vigorously changing flow of society. While allowing for change within the election process, we should base our decisions on real life, asking ourselves whether we are reacting to real problems,” stressed the Head of State. He added, “Some say that public organisations should receive the right to nominate candidates for deputies. However, we have thousands of public organisations. Secondly, why should we do this? Do we have a shortage of nominated candidates? Are candidates for deputies in short supply? They are not, so why do we have to make such suggestions? Are we anticipating something?”
According to Mr. Lukashenko, change should reflect real life needs, with improvement of electoral law aiming to help citizens realise their election rights in full, while counteracting attempts to disrupt the process. The Head of State believes that the existing Electoral Code is effective. “We have held top-notch elections. If we forget the partisan opinions voiced by some of our opponents and look at the real picture (the opinions of our well-wishers and neutral people) we can see that they envy our level of elections. Everyone says that they are serious and worthy of admiration,” the President notes. “We can also take a closer look at the OSCE recommendations — made after monitoring the parliamentary elections in 2012. We don’t necessarily agree with all the OSCE views but we understand what the OSCE wants from us. In responding, we need to note the true intention behind these suggestions.”
The President emphasised that our national legislation is being improved in the interests of Belarus alone — not at someone else’s bidding. “The Belarusian saying comes to mind that it’s good to listen to others but that you should retain your own opinion. We should forget politicised, contrived views from outside while analysing proposals in our national interests,” Mr. Lukashenko remarked.
The meeting turned to prospects for developing electoral law, with proposals from the Central Commission of Belarus for Elections and National Referenda discussed, alongside recommendations by international institutions — such as the OSCE. Most of those present spoke against allowing national public organisations to nominate candidates for deputies. The Chairwoman of the Central Election Commission (CEC) believes that the rejection of this idea would satisfy political opponents who actively opposed this innovation. Other CEC initiatives received support, including the transition to the majority principle at parliamentary elections (during their first round), which would simplify the election campaign and reduce expenses.
The raising of personal election funds for candidates standing as deputies of local councils was also discussed.
Заметили ошибку? Пожалуйста, выделите её и нажмите Ctrl+Enter